OATAO - Open Archive Toulouse Archive Ouverte Open Access Week

Comparison Criteria for Argumentation Semantics

Doutre, Sylvie and Mailly, Jean-Guy Comparison Criteria for Argumentation Semantics. (2018) In: EUMAS 2017. 15th European Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, 14 December 2017 - 15 December 2017 (Evry, France).

(Document in English)

PDF (Author’s version) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01713-2_16


Argumentation reasoning is a way for agents to evaluate a situation. Given a framework made of conflicting arguments, a semantics allows to evaluate the acceptability of the arguments. It may happen that the semantics associated to the framework has to be changed. In order to perform the most suitable change, the current and a potential new semantics have to be compared. Notions of difference measures between semantics have already been proposed, and application cases where they have to be minimized when a change of semantics has to be performed, have been highlighted. This paper develops these notions, it proposes an additional kind of difference measure, and shows application cases where measures may have to be maximized, and combined.

Item Type:Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
HAL Id:hal-02649413
Audience (conference):International conference proceedings
Uncontrolled Keywords:
Institution:French research institutions > Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - CNRS (FRANCE)
Université de Toulouse > Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse - Toulouse INP (FRANCE)
Université de Toulouse > Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier - UT3 (FRANCE)
Université de Toulouse > Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès - UT2J (FRANCE)
Université de Toulouse > Université Toulouse 1 Capitole - UT1 (FRANCE)
Other partners > Université de Paris - U-Paris (FRANCE)
Laboratory name:
Deposited On:29 May 2020 09:22

Repository Staff Only: item control page