Lorini, Emiliano On the epistemic foundation for iterated weak dominance: an analysis in a logic of individual and collective attitudes. (2013) Journal of Philosophical Logic, 42 (6). 863-904. ISSN 0022-3611
|
(Document in English)
PDF (Author's version) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader 845kB |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10992-013-9297-z
Abstract
This paper proposes a logical framework for representing static and dynamic properties of different kinds of individual and collective attitudes. A complete axiomatization as well as a decidability result for the logic are given. The logic is applied to game theory by providing a formal analysis of the epistemic conditions of iterated deletion of weakly dominated strategies (IDWDS), or iterated weak dominance for short. The main difference between the analysis of the epistemic conditions of iterated weak dominance given in this paper and other analysis is that we use a semi-qualitative approach to uncertainty based on the notion of plausibility first introduced by Spohn, whereas other analysis are based on a quantitative representation of uncertainty in terms of probabilities.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Additional Information: | Thanks to Springer Verlag editor. The definitive version is available at http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10992-013-9297-z |
HAL Id: | hal-01130395 |
Audience (journal): | International peer-reviewed journal |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | |
Institution: | Université de Toulouse > Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse - Toulouse INP (FRANCE) French research institutions > Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - CNRS (FRANCE) Université de Toulouse > Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier - UT3 (FRANCE) Université de Toulouse > Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès - UT2J (FRANCE) Université de Toulouse > Université Toulouse 1 Capitole - UT1 (FRANCE) |
Laboratory name: | |
Statistics: | download |
Deposited On: | 11 Mar 2015 15:55 |
Repository Staff Only: item control page