OATAO - Open Archive Toulouse Archive Ouverte Open Access Week

An evaluation of methods to assess the effect of antimicrobial residues on the human gut flora

Corpet, Denis E. An evaluation of methods to assess the effect of antimicrobial residues on the human gut flora. (1993) Veterinary Microbiology, vol.35 (n°3/4). pp. 199-212. ISSN 0378-1135

[img] (Document in English)

PDF (Author's version) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
134kB

Official URL: http://tinyurl.com/yes84uy

Abstract

1. Barrier effect. Relevant models should include an anaerobic dominant flora that antagonizes minor bacterial populations such as drug resistant E. coli. 2. Anaerobes vs. aerobes. Aerobe counts are more precise and much less time consuming than anaerobe counts. Minor populations of drug resistant aerobes are sensitive markers of the ecosystem balance, and are directly relevant to the potential risk of antimicrobial residues. 3. MIC vs. plate counts. The determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations ( MIC ) of selected clones is time consuming, does not detect subdominant resistance (less than 1 %), and the MIC shift is difficult to test statistically. In contrast, direct counts of bacteria on drug supplemented media allows a rapid measure of minor resistant populations. 4. Statistics: Most published designs do not include adequate statistical evaluation. This is critical for trials made in conventional humans and animals, where data are highly variable. 5. Human trials: The lowest concentration of antibiotic tested in human volunteers (2mg oxytetracycline /d for 7d in 6 subjects) significantly increased the proportion of resistant fecal enterobacteria (P=0.05). However, the huge day-to-day and inter-individual variations of human floras make this evidence rather weak. 6. Gnotobiotic mice inoculated with human flora are living isolated models in which the effect of any antimicrobial on the human gut flora can be tested. This in vivo model does include the barrier effect of dominant anaerobes. Inter-individual and day-to-day variations of bacterial populations are lower in those mice than in humans. 7. Most resistant enterobacteria in the human gut of untreated people come from bacterial contamination of raw foods. The relative contribution of residues in selecting antibiotic resistance seems to be low when compared to bacterial contamination.

Item Type:Article
Additional Information:Thanks to Elsevier editor. The definitive version is available at http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/503320/description#description
Audience (journal):International peer-reviewed journal
Uncontrolled Keywords:
Institution:French research institutions > Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - INRA
Université de Toulouse > Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse - ENVT
Laboratory name:
Statistics:download
Deposited By: Denis CORPET

Repository Staff Only: item control page